Roush 2005-2009 Ford Mustang Low Temp Intercooler (For 420112/420113/421114)

Performance Enhancement

Optimize the performance of your 2005-2009 Roush Mustang with the direct-fit Intercooler Low Temp Radiator. Engineered to reduce intake temperatures and enhance cooling, this radiator maximizes airflow for superior engine performance. Elevate your Mustang with increased horsepower and torque thanks to this premium-quality radiator.

Product Highlights

Replacement Mustang intercooler (or low temp radiator) for the following 2005-2009 Roush Supercharger kits:

• Mustang Supercharger, M90 (2005-2006) – Part #420112
• Mustang Supercharger, M90 Chrome (2005-2006) – Part #420113
• Mustang Supercharger, M90 (2007-2008) – Part #420114
• Mustang Supercharger, TVS2300 Phase 1 Single Belt (2005-2009) – Part #421099
• Mustang Supercharger, TVS2300 Phase 2 Dual Belt (2005-2009) – Part #421100
• Mustang Supercharger, TVS2300 Phase 2 Dual Belt (2005-2009) – Part #421103

Fitment

Roush Performance Warranty

For information on Roush Performance warranty terms and conditions, please click here.

Purchase Disclaimer: You are hereby informed and warned to check your local, state, and federal laws before buying and installing these or any aftermarket parts to be sure whether usage is in violation. All installation-risk and use-risk is borne by the end-user and installer of these parts. Bolt Motorsports does not condone the use of emission defeat devices for any vehicles used on public streets or roadways. Bolt Motorsports will not tamper, remove, disable, or bypass emissions equipment on a motor vehicle in accordance with 40 CFR Section 86.1854.12(a)(3), Clean Air Act 40 CFR 1068.101(b). This includes software, known as tunes, that reprogram a motor vehicles electronic control module to alter engine performance and enable the removal of filters, catalysts, and other critical emissions controls. In accordance with local laws and regulations, Bolt Motorsports will not ship parts to locations where usage or installation of said part would be in violation of the aforementioned acts.